Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes

Abdulrahim Aljayar

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes

Abdulrahim Aljayar

Published in Science Journal of Clinical Medicine (Volume 12, Issue 2)

Received: 17 April 2023 Accepted: 16 May 2023 Published: 14 September 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Despite all efforts made by healthcare systems around the world to prevent medical errors from occurring, their incidence rates are still increasing, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe it as an epidemic problem. Realizing it is a thorny, sensitive subject, difficult to reach a consensus on, and despite the scarcity of sources related to hand surgery in particular, as well as the reluctance of some individuals and official institutions to provide information about it, we decide to tackle the issue because of its importance, especially since most of these errors are preventable and avoidable, by analyzing 245 cases detected or referred to the hand clinic in Benghazi between January 2020 and December 2021, who were suffering iatrogenic adverse effects related to previous surgical interventions. After excluding the non-surgical errors, we found that the percentage of intraoperative technical errors in hand surgery was 39.1%, with inadequate procedures being the most common at a rate of 65.6% and the lack of appropriately efficient equipment being the reason for 32.4% of these errors. To conclude, practical special training in hand surgery and the discovery of the root causes of these errors are the best ways to reduce them to a minimum.

Published in	Science Journal of Clinical Medicine (Volume 12, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
Page(s)	23-30
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Iatrogenic Complications, Technical Errors, Malpractice, Patient Safety

References

[1]	Pakis, Isil, et al. "The role of legal autopsy in the investigation of death cases due to medical malpractice." Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi 28.1 (2008).
[2]	Kohn, Linda T., Janet M. Corrigan, and Molla S. Donaldson. "Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system." (2000): 17-68.
[3]	Glickel, Steven Z. "The ethics of expediency." The Journal of hand surgery 34.5 (2009): 799-807.
[4]	Madea, Burkhard, and Johanna Preuß. "Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies." Forensic science international 190.1-3 (2009): 58-66.
[5]	Herring, Jonathan. Medical law and ethics. Oxford University Press, USA, 2014.
[6]	Delacroix, Romuald. "Exploring the experience of nurse practitioners who have committed medical errors: A phenomenological approach." Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners 29.7 (2017): 403-409.
[7]	Americans’ Experiences with Medical Errors and Views on Patient Safety Final Report (https://www.ihi.org/about/news/Documents/IHI_NPSF_NORC_Patient_Safety_Survey_2017_Final_Report.
[8]	Oyebode, Femi. "Clinical errors and medical negligence." Medical Principles and Practice 22.4 (2013): 323-333.
[9]	Johnson, Shepard P., Joshua M. Adkinson, and Kevin C. Chung. "Addressing medical errors in hand surgery." The Journal of hand surgery 39.9 (2014): 1877-1882.
[10]	Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Newhouse JP, Zbar BI, Howard KM, Williams EJ, et al. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry 1999; 36: 255-64.
[11]	Herndon, James H. "The patient first. Above all do no harm (primum non nocere)." JBJS 95.4 (2013): 289-290.
[12]	Cobb, Tyson K. "Wrong site surgery-where are we and what is the next step?." Hand 7.2 (2012): 229-232.
[13]	Agout, C., et al. "Epidemiology of malpractice claims in the orthopedic and trauma surgery department of a French teaching hospital: a 10-year retrospective study." Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 104.1 (2018): 11-15.
[14]	A. B. Jena, S. Seabury, D. Lakdawalla, A. Chandra, Malpractice risk according to physician specialty, N Engl J Med, 365 (2011), pp. 629-636.
[15]	I. H. Khan, W. Jamil, S. M. Lynn, O. H. Khan, K. Markland, G. Giddins Analysis of NHSLA claims in orthopedic surgery Orthopedics, 35 (2012), pp. e726-e731.
[16]	N. D. Pappas, D. Moat, D. H. Lee, Medical malpractice in hand surgery, J Hand Surg Am, 39 (2014), pp. 168-170.
[17]	17.. D. M. Studdert, M. M. Mello, W. M. Sage, C. M. DesRoches, J. Peugh, K. Zapert, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment JAMA, 293 (2005), pp. 2609-2617.
[18]	U. Tarantino, A. Giai Via, E. Macrì, A. Eramo, V. Marino, L. T. Marsella, Professional liability in orthopaedics and traumatology in Italy, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471 (2013), pp. 3349-3357.
[19]	Worled Health Organization. World Alliance of patient safety, Geneva (Swetzrland): World Health Organization; 2010, Accessed 2011, Sebtember 25, available from URL: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/en/index.html.
[20]	Regenbogen, Scott E., et al. "Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients." Annals of surgery 246.5 (2007): 705-711.
[21]	Sasor, Sarah E., and Kevin C. Chung. "Litigation in hand surgery: a 30-year review." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 146.4 (2020): 430e-438e.
[22]	Di Nunno, Nunzio, et al. "Medical malpractice: a study of case histories by the Forensic Medicine Section of Bari." The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology 25.2 (2004): 141-144.
[23]	Fisha K, Azage M, Mulat G, Tamirat KS. The prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections in public versus private hospitals in Ethiopia: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Jul 10; 13: 26.
[24]	A Review of the Frequency of Medical Error in Saudi Arabia: An Emerging Concern.
[25]	Philippe Michel, Jean Luc Quenon, Ahmed Djihoud, Sophie Tricaud‐Vialle, and Anne Marie de Sarasqueta, French national survey of inpatient adverse events prospectively assessed with ward staff, Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct; 16(5): 369–377.
[26]	Wong DA, Herndon JH, Canale ST, et al. Medical errors in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009; 91: 547–557.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdulrahim Aljayar. (2023). Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdulrahim Aljayar. Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes. Sci. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdulrahim Aljayar. Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes. Sci J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12,
  author = {Abdulrahim Aljayar},
  title = {Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes},
  journal = {Science Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume = {12},
  number = {2},
  pages = {23-30},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjcm.20231202.12},
  abstract = {Despite all efforts made by healthcare systems around the world to prevent medical errors from occurring, their incidence rates are still increasing, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe it as an epidemic problem. Realizing it is a thorny, sensitive subject, difficult to reach a consensus on, and despite the scarcity of sources related to hand surgery in particular, as well as the reluctance of some individuals and official institutions to provide information about it, we decide to tackle the issue because of its importance, especially since most of these errors are preventable and avoidable, by analyzing 245 cases detected or referred to the hand clinic in Benghazi between January 2020 and December 2021, who were suffering iatrogenic adverse effects related to previous surgical interventions. After excluding the non-surgical errors, we found that the percentage of intraoperative technical errors in hand surgery was 39.1%, with inadequate procedures being the most common at a rate of 65.6% and the lack of appropriately efficient equipment being the reason for 32.4% of these errors. To conclude, practical special training in hand surgery and the discovery of the root causes of these errors are the best ways to reduce them to a minimum.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes
AU  - Abdulrahim Aljayar
Y1  - 2023/09/14
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
T2  - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF  - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
JO  - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
SP  - 23
EP  - 30
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2732
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
AB  - Despite all efforts made by healthcare systems around the world to prevent medical errors from occurring, their incidence rates are still increasing, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe it as an epidemic problem. Realizing it is a thorny, sensitive subject, difficult to reach a consensus on, and despite the scarcity of sources related to hand surgery in particular, as well as the reluctance of some individuals and official institutions to provide information about it, we decide to tackle the issue because of its importance, especially since most of these errors are preventable and avoidable, by analyzing 245 cases detected or referred to the hand clinic in Benghazi between January 2020 and December 2021, who were suffering iatrogenic adverse effects related to previous surgical interventions. After excluding the non-surgical errors, we found that the percentage of intraoperative technical errors in hand surgery was 39.1%, with inadequate procedures being the most common at a rate of 65.6% and the lack of appropriately efficient equipment being the reason for 32.4% of these errors. To conclude, practical special training in hand surgery and the discovery of the root causes of these errors are the best ways to reduce them to a minimum.
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Abdulrahim Aljayar

Hand Surgery Unit, Orthopedics Department, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdulrahim Aljayar. (2023). Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdulrahim Aljayar. Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes. Sci. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdulrahim Aljayar. Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes. Sci J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12,
  author = {Abdulrahim Aljayar},
  title = {Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes},
  journal = {Science Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume = {12},
  number = {2},
  pages = {23-30},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjcm.20231202.12},
  abstract = {Despite all efforts made by healthcare systems around the world to prevent medical errors from occurring, their incidence rates are still increasing, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe it as an epidemic problem. Realizing it is a thorny, sensitive subject, difficult to reach a consensus on, and despite the scarcity of sources related to hand surgery in particular, as well as the reluctance of some individuals and official institutions to provide information about it, we decide to tackle the issue because of its importance, especially since most of these errors are preventable and avoidable, by analyzing 245 cases detected or referred to the hand clinic in Benghazi between January 2020 and December 2021, who were suffering iatrogenic adverse effects related to previous surgical interventions. After excluding the non-surgical errors, we found that the percentage of intraoperative technical errors in hand surgery was 39.1%, with inadequate procedures being the most common at a rate of 65.6% and the lack of appropriately efficient equipment being the reason for 32.4% of these errors. To conclude, practical special training in hand surgery and the discovery of the root causes of these errors are the best ways to reduce them to a minimum.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Intraoperative Technical Errors in Hand Surgery: Prevalence and Potential Root Causes
AU  - Abdulrahim Aljayar
Y1  - 2023/09/14
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
T2  - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF  - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
JO  - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
SP  - 23
EP  - 30
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2732
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20231202.12
AB  - Despite all efforts made by healthcare systems around the world to prevent medical errors from occurring, their incidence rates are still increasing, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe it as an epidemic problem. Realizing it is a thorny, sensitive subject, difficult to reach a consensus on, and despite the scarcity of sources related to hand surgery in particular, as well as the reluctance of some individuals and official institutions to provide information about it, we decide to tackle the issue because of its importance, especially since most of these errors are preventable and avoidable, by analyzing 245 cases detected or referred to the hand clinic in Benghazi between January 2020 and December 2021, who were suffering iatrogenic adverse effects related to previous surgical interventions. After excluding the non-surgical errors, we found that the percentage of intraoperative technical errors in hand surgery was 39.1%, with inadequate procedures being the most common at a rate of 65.6% and the lack of appropriately efficient equipment being the reason for 32.4% of these errors. To conclude, practical special training in hand surgery and the discovery of the root causes of these errors are the best ways to reduce them to a minimum.
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download